From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yasus v. Metropolitan Transportation Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1987
128 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

March 3, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.).


The plaintiff complains of injuries suffered on September 25, 1982 when he fell between a temporary boarding platform and the train at the Woodside station of the defendant Long Island Railroad.

A notice of claim was served on December 14, 1982, and the summons and complaint were served on December 21, 1983. Issue was joined on January 6, 1984, and the defendants raised the affirmative defense of the Statute of Limitations in their answer.

The pertinent statute is Public Authorities Law § 1276 (2), which requires that the action be commenced not later than one year after the cause of action has accrued. Subdivision (6) of the same section discusses the Statute of Limitations with respect to a subsidiary corporation. In Andersen v. Long Is. R.R. ( 59 N.Y.2d 657), it was held that the Long Island Railroad is a subsidiary corporation of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and, therefore, the same limitation's rule would apply.

Subdivision (1) of Public Authorities Law § 1276, providing for a 30-day waiting period after a notice of claim, gives a total possible time of one year and 30 days. (See, Penner v. National R.R. Passenger Corp., 98 A.D.2d 631.) Thus, the summons and complaint having been served more than one year and 30 days after plaintiff's cause of action accrued, defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations should have been granted.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ross, Milonas, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

Yasus v. Metropolitan Transportation Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1987
128 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Yasus v. Metropolitan Transportation Auth

Case Details

Full title:FRANK YASUS et al., Respondents, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1987

Citations

128 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Celli v. Metro-North Commuter R.R.

The plaintiffs' argument is meritless. Section 1276 applies because MTA is a public authority and Metro-North…

Cassandro v. Metro. Bus Auth

CPLR 210 (a) provides that when a person entitled to commence an action dies before the expiration of the…