From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yapalater v. Bates

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 25, 1981
644 F.2d 131 (2d Cir. 1981)

Opinion

Nos. 827, 905, Dockets 80-7755, 80-7775.

Argued February 24, 1981.

Decided March 25, 1981.

Ellen J. Bronzo, Asst. Atty. Gen., New York City (Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. of the State of New York, George D. Zuckerman, Asst. Sol. Gen., New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees-cross-appellants.

Samuel S. Yasgur, Westchester County Atty., Jonathan Lovett, Deputy County Atty., Eric D. Koster, Senior Asst. County Atty., White Plains, N.Y., of counsel, for defendants-appellees.

Seth P. Stein, Seligman, Stein Abramowitz, Garden City, N. Y., for the New York State Psychiatric Association as amicus curiae.

Marc E. Grossman, White Plains, N.Y. (Evelyn K. Isaac, Fahey Isaac, White Plains, N.Y., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Before OAKES and KEARSE, Circuit Judges, and NEAHER, District Judge.

Of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.


We affirm on the memorandum opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Charles S. Haight, Jr., Judge, 494 F.Supp. 1349 (S.D.N.Y. 1980), holding that Yapalater is entitled to assert his claim under § 1983, but dismissing his complaint on the merits.


Summaries of

Yapalater v. Bates

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 25, 1981
644 F.2d 131 (2d Cir. 1981)
Case details for

Yapalater v. Bates

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN R. YAPALATER, M.D., F.A.P.A., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES W…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Mar 25, 1981

Citations

644 F.2d 131 (2d Cir. 1981)

Citing Cases

White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Williams

Unlike the situation in Thiboutot, no federal statute or regulation was violated by the Arizona tax on…

Vantage Healthcare v. Virginia Bd. of Med.

Rather, it would seem that recipients and providers are each invested with certain specific enforceable…