From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yagman v. United State Department of Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 22, 2014
CV 13-0354 PA (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2014)

Opinion

CV 13-0354 PA (Ex)

03-22-2014

STEPHEN YAGMAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT, and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's March 3, 2014 Minute Order granting the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Internal Revenue Service, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, and Federal Bureau of Investigation (collectively "Defendants") on plaintiff Stephen Yagman's ("Plaintiff") Complaint,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is granted in favor of Defendants.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff shall take nothing and that Defendants shall have their costs of suit.

__________

Percy Anderson

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Yagman v. United State Department of Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 22, 2014
CV 13-0354 PA (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2014)
Case details for

Yagman v. United State Department of Justice

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN YAGMAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 22, 2014

Citations

CV 13-0354 PA (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2014)

Citing Cases

Am. Civil Liberties Union of Me. Found. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

CBP, thus, carries its burden to demonstrate the appropriateness of the redaction of this material pursuant…

Am. Civil Liberties Union of Me. Found. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Unlike the cases cited by the Government, these redactions do not protect "non-public investigative…