From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yablonsky v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 25, 2021
Case No.: 18-cv-1122-AGS (S.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2021)

Opinion

Case No.: 18-cv-1122-AGS

01-25-2021

John Henry YABLONSKY, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO WAIVE DEPOSITION FEES AND COSTS (ECF 95)

Plaintiff's request to waive deposition fees and costs, including transcription costs, is denied. Prisoners proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 may use any discovery method set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. However, 28 U.S.C. § 1915 "does not extend to the cost of taking and transcribing a deposition." Starkey v. Hernandez, No. 317CV01158JLSKSC, 2018 WL 2441554, at *1 (S.D. Cal. May 31, 2018) (citation omitted); see also Arellano v. Hodge, No. 14-CV-590 JLS (JLB), 2018 WL 637854, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2018) ("§ 1915 does not authorize or require federal courts to finance or subsidize a civil action by paying fees or other costs associated with the litigation."). Therefore, plaintiff "must bear the costs of recording the . . . deposition as well as transcribing the deposition." Golez v. Potter, No. 09-CV-965 AJB WMC, 2011 WL 3021045, at *1 (S.D. Cal. July 21, 2011). Dated: January 25, 2021

/s/_________

Hon. Andrew G. Schopler

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Yablonsky v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 25, 2021
Case No.: 18-cv-1122-AGS (S.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Yablonsky v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab.

Case Details

Full title:John Henry YABLONSKY, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS …

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 25, 2021

Citations

Case No.: 18-cv-1122-AGS (S.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2021)