From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wynn v. Connor

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 11, 2008
Civ. File No. 05-2212 (PAM/JJG) (D. Minn. Feb. 11, 2008)

Summary

holding that the plaintiff had not exhausted his administrative remedies, pursuant to the PLRA, where he sent numerous kites, but never filed a formal grievance pertaining to the issues raised in that case

Summary of this case from King v. Dingle

Opinion

Civ. File No. 05-2212 (PAM/JJG).

February 11, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham dated January 10, 2008. Plaintiff did not file objections to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 58 and 69) are GRANTED;
2. Defendant Burkholder's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 48) is treated as a Motion for Summary Judgment and is GRANTED; and
3. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Wynn v. Connor

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 11, 2008
Civ. File No. 05-2212 (PAM/JJG) (D. Minn. Feb. 11, 2008)

holding that the plaintiff had not exhausted his administrative remedies, pursuant to the PLRA, where he sent numerous kites, but never filed a formal grievance pertaining to the issues raised in that case

Summary of this case from King v. Dingle
Case details for

Wynn v. Connor

Case Details

Full title:Lucas C. Wynn, Plaintiff, v. M. Connor, Warden Ferries, Sgt. Cortez…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Feb 11, 2008

Citations

Civ. File No. 05-2212 (PAM/JJG) (D. Minn. Feb. 11, 2008)

Citing Cases

King v. Dingle

As such, an inmate's "[f]ailure to adhere to DOC's sequential grievance process after the sending of the kite…