From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wyman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 14, 1984
459 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. AX-466.

November 14, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, James L. Harrison, J.

Michael Allen, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Henri C. Cawthon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant appeals his conviction of burglary of a structure, asserting that he was improperly sentenced under the sentencing guidelines, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701. We agree with appellant that the record does not contain any proper evidentiary basis to support the trial court's departure from the guidelines on the ground that appellant "induced another to commit a criminal offense together with defendant." Therefore, we reverse the sentencing order and remand for resentencing under the sentencing guidelines.

JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wyman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 14, 1984
459 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Wyman v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE W. WYMAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 14, 1984

Citations

459 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Wiggins v. State

Thus, this reason for departure is not justified on the facts. Cf. Wyman v. State, 459 So.2d 1118 (Fla. 1st…

Tanner v. State

The record must contain a proper evidentiary basis to support a departure. Wyman v. State, 459 So.2d 1118…