Opinion
52946.
SUBMITTED OCTOBER 7, 1976.
DECIDED NOVEMBER 4, 1976.
Robbery. Lowndes Superior Court. Before Judge Horkan.
James Wyche, pro se. H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, for appellee.
This is an appeal by an indigent without counsel whose pro se "Notice of Appeal" shows he is presently incarcerated in a Florida prison. He appeals from two 1972 Lowndes County sentences imposed following pleas of guilty to robbery charges wherein he was represented by counsel. It comes to us by transfer from our Supreme Court.
The trial court granted permission to file an out-of-time appeal in forma pauperis. In doing so it cited Wilson v. Downie, 228 Ga. 656 ( 187 S.E.2d 293); Griffin v. Smith, 228 Ga. 177 ( 184 S.E.2d 459); Johnson v. Smith, 227 Ga. 611 ( 182 S.E.2d 101); Keys v. State, 127 Ga. App. 404 ( 193 S.E.2d 891).
1. We have neither a brief nor an enumeration of errors. Nevertheless we are required to consider the contentions of the appellant. See Clark v. State, 138 Ga. App. 266, 267 (1) ( 226 S.E.2d 89) and Spriggs v. State, 139 Ga. App. 586.
2. Appellant's request for a trial transcript was denied. Such denial was error. Code Ann. § 6-805 (a) and Parrott v. State, 134 Ga. App. 160, 161 (2) ( 214 S.E.2d 3).
The basis of this appeal — an allegedly coerced confession and a denial of a direct appeal — presents a situation markedly different from that in which such request has been denied as in Billups v. State, 234 Ga. 147 ( 214 S.E.2d 884) and in Evans v. Watson, 237 Ga. 249 ( 227 S.E.2d 253). In those opinions and in the citations contained therein, the appellant made no showing as to the need or purpose for which the transcripts were sought. As was said in Wilson v. Downie, 228 Ga. 656, 658 ( 187 S.E.2d 293), "There must be some justification or showing of necessity beyond a mere naked demand for a transcript." With reference to the type of transcript which should be supplied see the discussion reviewing the U.S. Supreme Court cases in Bailey v. State, 232 Ga. 873 ( 209 S.E.2d 204).
3. With the court having recognized and ruled that defendant was to receive an out-of-time appeal, it was also incumbent upon the judge to grant the appellant's motion for appointment of counsel to handle his appeal. Every indigent defendant is entitled to benefit of counsel at the first level of review. Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 ( 83 SC 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811); Swenson v. Bosler, 386 U.S. 258 ( 87 SC 996, 18 L.Ed.2d 33).
4. Accordingly, we remand this case to the trial court with direction that counsel be appointed to represent the appellant and that a transcript be provided.
Case remanded with direction. Bell, C. J., and Stolz, J., concur.