From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wyatt v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 4, 1989
378 S.E.2d 690 (Ga. 1989)

Opinion

46648.

DECIDED MAY 4, 1989.

Drug violation; constitutional question. Gwinnett Superior Court. Before Judge Huff.

Robert C. Sacks, for appellant.

Thomas C. Lawler III, District Attorney, Debra K. Turner, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


George Ponder Wyatt was convicted of trafficking in cocaine in violation of OCGA § 16-13-31. He was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment and fined $100,000. We affirm.

Wyatt asserts that the evidence does not support the verdict and that the statute's mandatory fine provision violates the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Art. I, Sec. I, Par. XVII of the 1983 Georgia Constitution.

1. Construed in a light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence showed that Wyatt participated in the sale of three ounces of cocaine to an informant for the Drug Enforcement Administration. He was present during the sale and participated in packaging and weighing the cocaine. When there was a shortfall in the amount, he commented, "... we'll make the difference up out of ours." After the sale, Wyatt was arrested at the scene of the sale and drug paraphernalia was seized. We conclude that this evidence is sufficient to support the jury's finding Wyatt guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crime of trafficking in cocaine. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 ( 99 S.C. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979).

2. Under the United States and Georgia Constitutions, a punishment is excessive so as to amount to cruel and unusual punishment if it "(1) makes no measurable contribution to accepted goals of punishment and hence is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering; or (2) is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime." Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 ( 97 S.C. 2861, 53 L.Ed.2d 982) (1977). We hold that the fine imposed under OCGA § 16-13-31 is not out of proportion to the severity of the crime and is not constitutionally infirm either because of its mandatory nature or its amount. See Hargrove v. State, 253 Ga. 450 ( 321 S.E.2d 104) (1984) (a $5,000 mandatory fine for dogfighting is not cruel and unusual punishment); and Grant v. State, 258 Ga. 299 ( 368 S.E.2d 737) (1988) (mandatory life sentence for second conviction for selling cocaine is constitutional). Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

Wyatt does not challenge the statute on Fourteenth Amendment grounds. This case does not present the problem of incarceration of an indigent for failure or inability to pay a fine. See Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 ( 103 S.C. 2064, 76 L.Ed.2d 221) (1983).

DECIDED MAY 4, 1989.


Summaries of

Wyatt v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 4, 1989
378 S.E.2d 690 (Ga. 1989)
Case details for

Wyatt v. State

Case Details

Full title:WYATT v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: May 4, 1989

Citations

378 S.E.2d 690 (Ga. 1989)
378 S.E.2d 690

Citing Cases

Humphrey v. Wilson

Fleming, 259 Ga. at 689 (citations omitted). Accord Johnson v. State, 276 Ga. 57, 62 ( 573 SE2d 362) (2002);…

Woodruff v. State

This evidence suffices to sustain Woodruff's trafficking conviction.Wyatt v. State, 259 Ga. 208 (1) ( 378…