Opinion
Argued March 18, 1891
Decided April 7, 1891
Louis Marshall for appellant.
John A. Collier Wright for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except FOLLETT, Ch. J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Wright v. Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 7, 1891
26 N.E. 1107 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Wright v. Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 7, 1891
26 N.E. 1107 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Wright v. Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Rd. Co.
Case Details
Full title:HELEN S. WRIGHT, Respondent, v . THE SYRACUSE, BINGHAMTON AND NEW YORK…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 7, 1891
Citations
26 N.E. 1107 (N.Y. 1891)
124 N.Y. 668
Citing Cases
Preston v. United States
We note that for purposes of determining the government's pro rata share, the price later obligations must be…