From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Aug 19, 2020
306 So. 3d 1120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 3D19-0379

08-19-2020

Reginald WRIGHT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

The Law Offices of Sean Marcus, PLLC, and Sean T. Marcus, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


The Law Offices of Sean Marcus, PLLC, and Sean T. Marcus, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Melton v. State, 2020 WL 2781862 (Fla. 1st DCA May 29, 2020) (holding that because resentencing had not yet occurred, the court retained jurisdiction to reconsider its order granting resentencing based on an intervening change in the law); Adams v. State, 949 So. 2d 1125, 1126 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (holding that when a trial court grants a 3.800 motion, it has not granted the defendant any collateral relief until it resentences him as the order granting a 3.800(a) motion is not a final order) (citing State v. Delvalle, 745 So. 2d 541, 542 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) ).


Summaries of

Wright v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Aug 19, 2020
306 So. 3d 1120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:Reginald Wright, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Aug 19, 2020

Citations

306 So. 3d 1120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)