From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worsley v. Perdue

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 3, 2011
406 F. App'x 752 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-1848.

Submitted: December 21, 2010.

Decided: January 3, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00257-D).

Eddie Lee Worsley, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Eddie Lee Worsley appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Worsley's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Worsley has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Worsley v. Perdue

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 3, 2011
406 F. App'x 752 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Worsley v. Perdue

Case Details

Full title:Eddie Lee WORSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Beverly PERDUE, Governor…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 3, 2011

Citations

406 F. App'x 752 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Chappell v. Franklin

Although Chappell proceeds pro se, Chappell also unambiguously alleges claims against Franklin and Swett only…