From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worden v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 19, 1957
4 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Opinion

June 19, 1957

Appeal from the Court of Claims.

Present — McCurn P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Williams and Bastow, JJ. [ 2 Misc.2d 955.]


Order insofar as appealed from reversed and matter remitted to the Court of Claims to exercise its original discretion as to whether, under all the circumstances disclosed by the record, late filing should be permitted. Memorandum: We believe that the Court of Claims erred in holding that the time had not expired within which respondent could file a claim as of right. In the view which that court took of the case, it was not called upon to exercise its discretion in determining whether late filing of a claim should be permitted (Court of Claims Act, § 10, subd. 5) and it clearly did not do so. Since the discretion is that of the Court of Claims ( Roswal v. State of New York, 279 App. Div. 815), subject to review by this court, the order should be reversed and the matter remitted to the Court of Claims to exercise its original discretion in determining whether, under all the circumstances disclosed by the record, late filing should be permitted. All concur.


Summaries of

Worden v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 19, 1957
4 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)
Case details for

Worden v. State

Case Details

Full title:MYRTLE M. WORDEN, as Administratrix of the Estate of LOUIS G. WORDEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 19, 1957

Citations

4 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Citing Cases

Quintero v. Long Is. R.R

Most important, it discriminates irrationally between public benefit corporations which must be sued in the…

In re Matter of Barresi v. State of New York

Accordingly, the Court of Claims' failure to review the substantive portion of claimant's application for…