From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wooten v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jan 10, 2002
64 S.W.3d 708 (Ark. 2002)

Opinion

CR 01-986

Opinion Delivered January 10, 2002

Motions — rule on clerk — good cause for granting. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk.

Motion for Rule on Clerk; granted.

Alvin Schay, for appellant.

No response.


Appellant, Jimmy Don Wooten, by and through his attorney, Alvin Schay, has filed a motion for belated appeal, which will be treated as a motion for rule on the clerk. Appellant's attorney states in the motion that he was appointed to represent appellant in a Rule 37 appeal in a captial case, and the original due date for the abstract and brief was November 13, 2001. He obtained a thirty-day extension to December 13, 2001; and, although he intended to seek another thirty-day extension, he failed to do so by December 13, 2001.

[1] Mr. Schay admits in the instant motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals In Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). Accordingly, we grant the motion for rule on the clerk. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Id.

Imber, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Wooten v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jan 10, 2002
64 S.W.3d 708 (Ark. 2002)
Case details for

Wooten v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jimmy Don WOOTEN, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 10, 2002

Citations

64 S.W.3d 708 (Ark. 2002)
64 S.W.3d 708