From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wooten v. Sanders

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 4, 1978
572 F.2d 500 (5th Cir. 1978)

Opinion

No. 77-3236. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

May 4, 1978.

George N. Sparrow, Jr., E. Wayne Wallhausen, East Point, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

Toby B. Prodgers, Marietta, Ga., George H. Connell, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for Kermit Sanders.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Before RONEY, GEE and FAY, Circuit Judges.



For the reasons stated therein, the order of the district court dismissing plaintiff's action as untimely was correct.

Plaintiff's action under 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983 and 1985 alleges that defendants assaulted him and caused him bodily injury when they arrested him. State law controls the limitations period for actions under these sections. Plaintiff claims that in Georgia an action for assault is governed by a three-year common law limitations period. The district court found that the three-year common law period, if it ever existed, was no longer the law of Georgia. Rather, it found that Ga. Code Ann. § 3-1004, which provides a two-year limitations period for "actions for injuries to the person," was applicable.

Since plaintiff was arrested on May 2, 1975 and released on May 5, 1975, but did not bring this action until July 15, 1977, his action is time barred by the two-year limitations period of § 3-1004.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Wooten v. Sanders

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 4, 1978
572 F.2d 500 (5th Cir. 1978)
Case details for

Wooten v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR M. WOOTEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. KERMIT SANDERS, SHERIFF, COBB…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 4, 1978

Citations

572 F.2d 500 (5th Cir. 1978)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Garcia

" Blackmun, Section 1983 and Federal Protection of Individual Rights — Will the Statute Remain Alive or Fade…

Williams v. City of Atlanta

None of the cases cited by appellees involved a claim analogous to those advanced in the current case. See…