From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wooley v. Consolidated City of Jacksonville

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 27, 1970
433 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 29583 Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

October 27, 1970.

David U. Tumin, Asst. Counsel, James C. Rinaman, Jr., Gen. Counsel, William L. Durden, Special Counsel, Jacksonville, Fla., for respondents-appellants.

Robert W. Elrod, Jacksonville Beach, Fla., amicus curiae, Fla. Municipal Judges Assn.

Jewel Bertram Wooley, Jr. pro se; Samuel S. Jacobson, (Court-appointed) Datz Jacobson, Jacksonville, Fla., for petitioner-appellee.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.



In this case the District Court held that a defendant in a municipal court, in the absence of waiver, has a right to counsel if the potential penalty in all pending charges could amount to as much as imprisonment for 90 days or a fine of $500.

The decision of the District Court is reported, 308 F. Supp. 1194 (M.D., Fla., 1970). We agree with the District Court that a prisoner in the custody of municipal authorities may, in proper cases, have the benefit of the writ of habeas corpus. We consider it of no moment that the pro se petitioner did not correctly style his case.

We further agree that this petitioner-appellee was entitled to the benefit of the decision rendered in Harvey v. Mississippi, 5 Cir., 1965, 340 F.2d 263.

The judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Wooley v. Consolidated City of Jacksonville

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 27, 1970
433 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

Wooley v. Consolidated City of Jacksonville

Case Details

Full title:Jewel Bertram WOOLEY, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee, v. CONSOLIDATED CITY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Oct 27, 1970

Citations

433 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

Roberts v. Janco

For purposes of this case it is sufficient to note some of the recent federal and state cases which have…

West v. State of Louisiana

There is therefore no reason not to consider his petition as though he had named the proper respondent. See…