From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodyard v. Ryan

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 18, 2013
No. 13-15899 (9th Cir. Nov. 18, 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-15899 D.C. No. 2:13-cv-00342-SLG-JFM

11-18-2013

ALLEN WOODYARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLES L. RYAN; et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Sharon L. Gleason, District Judge, Presiding

Before: SILVERMAN, BYBEE and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges.

Allen Woodyard appeals pro se the district court's denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendant prison officials. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

Appellant's motion to expedite is denied as moot.
--------

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Woodyard v. Ryan

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 18, 2013
No. 13-15899 (9th Cir. Nov. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Woodyard v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN WOODYARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLES L. RYAN; et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 18, 2013

Citations

No. 13-15899 (9th Cir. Nov. 18, 2013)