From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodworth v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California,In Bank
Feb 10, 1908
153 Cal. 38 (Cal. 1908)

Opinion

S.F. No. 4955.

February 10, 1908.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition directed to the Superior Court of Marin County. Thos. J. Lennon, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Fred Woodworth, in pro. per., for Petitioner.


It cannot be held that the state may not, under some circumstances, maintain an action to prevent the issuance of a certificate of purchase of state land, which, as we read the pleadings, is practically the character of the action, the prosecution of which is here sought to be enjoined by prohibition. If this be so, we cannot say that the superior court has no jurisdiction of the action. The objection made by petitioner really is that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. It may be that the complaint here does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, but that is a matter for the trial court to determine in the exercise of its jurisdiction, and prohibition will not lie.

Application denied.


Summaries of

Woodworth v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California,In Bank
Feb 10, 1908
153 Cal. 38 (Cal. 1908)
Case details for

Woodworth v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:FRED WOODWORTH, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF MARIN…

Court:Supreme Court of California,In Bank

Date published: Feb 10, 1908

Citations

153 Cal. 38 (Cal. 1908)
94 P. 232

Citing Cases

Tide Water Assoc. Oil Co. v. Superior Court

[22] It is the general rule that the failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action does…