From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodward v. Mullah

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Dec 7, 2009
08-CV-463A (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2009)

Opinion

08-CV-463A.

December 7, 2009


ORDER


The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On November 4, 2009, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendant Norman Bezio's motion for dismissal be granted and that defendants' motion to stay discovery be denied as moot.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge McCarthy's Report and Recommendation, defendant Norman Bezio's motion for dismissal is granted and defendants' motion to stay discovery is denied as moot.

The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge McCarthy for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Woodward v. Mullah

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Dec 7, 2009
08-CV-463A (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2009)
Case details for

Woodward v. Mullah

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN WOODWARD (00-aa-6563), Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MULLAH, et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Dec 7, 2009

Citations

08-CV-463A (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2009)

Citing Cases

Sullivan v. Fischer

Even if Plaintiff alleged that Defendant had affirmed the decision, it would be insufficient to find that…

Mateo v. Gundrum

To the extent that Plaintiff claims that Defendant Martuscello was personally involved because he affirmed…