From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Wash. Metro. Transit Auth.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 25, 2019
No. 19-1924 (4th Cir. Nov. 25, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-1924

11-25-2019

SILVESTER WOODS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY ("WMATA"); AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 689 ("ATU"), Defendants - Appellees.

Silvester Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Richard Coel, WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Washington, D.C.; Paul M. Tyler, GROMFINE, TAYLOR & TYLER, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:18-cv-03494-PWG) Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Silvester Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Richard Coel, WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Washington, D.C.; Paul M. Tyler, GROMFINE, TAYLOR & TYLER, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Silvester Woods appeals the district court's order dismissing with prejudice Woods' amended civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woods v. WMATA, No. 8:18-cv-03494-PWG (D. Md. Aug. 9, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Woods v. Wash. Metro. Transit Auth.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 25, 2019
No. 19-1924 (4th Cir. Nov. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Woods v. Wash. Metro. Transit Auth.

Case Details

Full title:SILVESTER WOODS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 25, 2019

Citations

No. 19-1924 (4th Cir. Nov. 25, 2019)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. State

Because plaintiff “has had the opportunity to amend in response to [defendant's] identification of pleading…

Cooper v. Bozutto & Assocs.

"[W]hen a plaintiff has had the opportunity to amend in response to a defendant's identification of pleading…