From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Crow

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Jun 26, 2023
No. 23-3123-JWL (D. Kan. Jun. 26, 2023)

Opinion

23-3123-JWL

06-26-2023

KISHEN WOODS, SR., Plaintiff, v. SAM CROW, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, Kishen Woods, Sr., who is currently incarcerated at the Lansing Correctional Facility in Lansing, Kansas, brings this pro se civil rights case. The Court entered a Memorandum and Order (Doc. 3) denying Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis, finding Plaintiff is subject to the “three-strikes” provision under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court examined the Complaint and attachments and found no showing of imminent danger of serious physical injury. The Court also granted Plaintiff until June 16, 2023, to submit the $402.00 filing fee. The Court's order provided that “[t]he failure to submit the fee by that date will result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without additional prior notice.” (Doc. 3, at 3.) Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee by the deadline set forth in the order.

Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “authorizes a district court, upon a defendant's motion, to order the dismissal of an action for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or ‘a court order.'” Young v. U.S., 316 Fed.Appx. 764, 771 (10th Cir. 2009) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b)). “This rule has been interpreted as permitting district courts to dismiss actions sua sponte when one of these conditions is met.” Id. (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962); Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003)). “In addition, it is well established in this circuit that a district court is not obligated to follow any particular procedures when dismissing an action without prejudice under Rule 41(b).” Young, 316 Fed.Appx. at 771-72 (citations omitted).

Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee by the deadline set forth in the Court's order. As a consequence, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to comply with court orders.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that this action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Woods v. Crow

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Jun 26, 2023
No. 23-3123-JWL (D. Kan. Jun. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Woods v. Crow

Case Details

Full title:KISHEN WOODS, SR., Plaintiff, v. SAM CROW, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Kansas

Date published: Jun 26, 2023

Citations

No. 23-3123-JWL (D. Kan. Jun. 26, 2023)