From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodrow v. Louisville Jefferson County

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
May 12, 1961
346 S.W.2d 538 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961)

Summary

In Woodrow v. Louisville Jefferson County Planning Zoning Comm'n, 346 S.W.2d 538 (Ky. 1961), it was held that an appealing party must affirmatively show by some participation in the commissioner's record that he entered an appearance as an interested party.

Summary of this case from Sterling v. County of Spokane

Opinion

May 12, 1961.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Common Pleas Branch, Fourth Division, Jefferson County, J. Paul Keith, Jr., J.

R.D. McAfee, Louisville, for appellants.

James L. Taylor, Oldham Clarke, James M. Cuneo, Louisville, for appellees.


The Woodrows are appealing from an order of the Jefferson Circuit Court which dismissed their appeal from a decision of the Louisville and Jefferson County Planning and Zoning Commission approving a plat of Green Ridge Manor subdivision under KRS 100.088 and 100.089. The question to be resolved is whether the court correctly held that the Woodrows were not "parties of record" within the meaning of KRS 100.089 and 100.057 and were therefore not entitled to appeal from the commission's decision.

The statutes (KRS 100.089 and 100.057) which govern appeals to the circuit court from decisions of the commission provide in pertinent part that only a person who is "a party of record at such hearing, claiming to be injuriously affected or aggrieved by any action or decision by the commission, may appeal from such action or decision, to the circuit court. * * *."

The minutes of the commission's hearings do not disclose that appellants filed a protest concerning the proposed subdivision or that they appeared at the public hearings of the matter. The only basis appellants have for claiming to be parties of record is an allegation in their statement of appeal to the circuit court that their attorney objected to the approval of the proposed subdivision. However, appellants have failed to produce any record of the commission which shows that an objection was made.

While KRS 100.057 does not require that a copy of the entire record be filed on an appeal to the circuit court, it is necessary under this statute for the appealing parties to affirmatively show by some part of the commission's record that they entered an appearance as protestants. A further requirement is that they claim to be injuriously affected or aggrieved by the action or decision of the commission. See Ray v. Luckett, Ky., 332 S.W.2d 848, and Duncan v. Louisville and Jefferson County Planning and Zoning Commission, Ky., 238 S.W.2d 127.

The trial court correctly held that appellants have failed to establish the fact that they were parties of record as required by the appeal statutes.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Woodrow v. Louisville Jefferson County

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
May 12, 1961
346 S.W.2d 538 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961)

In Woodrow v. Louisville Jefferson County Planning Zoning Comm'n, 346 S.W.2d 538 (Ky. 1961), it was held that an appealing party must affirmatively show by some participation in the commissioner's record that he entered an appearance as an interested party.

Summary of this case from Sterling v. County of Spokane
Case details for

Woodrow v. Louisville Jefferson County

Case Details

Full title:Jennings WOODROW et al., Appellants, v. LOUISVILLE JEFFERSON COUNTY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: May 12, 1961

Citations

346 S.W.2d 538 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961)

Citing Cases

Washoe Cnty. v. Otto

We recognize that generally, to be a party of record, one must enter an appearance or participate in some…

Sterling v. County of Spokane

This rule has also been followed in other jurisdictions, with statutes requiring a proposed appellant be a…