From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wooding v. Thom

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 18, 1913
103 N.E. 1135 (N.Y. 1913)

Opinion

Argued October 27, 1913

Decided November 18, 1913

Frank V. Johnson and Amos H. Stephens for appellant.

Chas. Caldwell for plaintiff, respondent and appellant.

John Vernou Bouvier, Jr., and Edward F. Lindsay for defendant, respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, to plaintiff, respondent, on appeal of defendant Thom, and with costs to defendant Scudder as against the plaintiff on the latter's appeal; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and HOGAN, JJ. Not sitting: MILLER, J.


Summaries of

Wooding v. Thom

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 18, 1913
103 N.E. 1135 (N.Y. 1913)
Case details for

Wooding v. Thom

Case Details

Full title:BELLE WOODING, Respondent and Appellant, v . WILLIAM B. THOM, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 18, 1913

Citations

103 N.E. 1135 (N.Y. 1913)
103 N.E. 1135

Citing Cases

Nash v. Baun

" In Martin v. Maxwell-Brisco etc. Co., 158 Mo. App. 188 ( 138 S.W. 65), Wooding v. Thom, 209 N.Y. 583 ( 103…