From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WOODHOUSE v. BOMBARDIER MOTOR CORP., AM

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 19, 2004
5 A.D.3d 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

CA 03-02022.

Decided March 19, 2004.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Michael E. Daley, J.), entered December 9, 2002. The order denied plaintiff's motion to set aside the verdict.

STANLEY LAW OFFICE, SYRACUSE (JOSEPH P. STANLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN DICKER, LLP, WHITE PLAINS (THOMAS W. TOBIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS BOMBARDIER MOTOR CORPORATION OF AMERICA AND BOMBARDIER, INC.

HURWITZ FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL F. PERLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT KAUFMAN SALES AND SERVICES.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., PINE, SCUDDER, KEHOE, AND GORSKI, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Woodhouse v. Bombardier Motor Corp. of Am. ([appeal No. 2] 5 A.D.3d 1029 [Mar. 19, 2004]).


Summaries of

WOODHOUSE v. BOMBARDIER MOTOR CORP., AM

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 19, 2004
5 A.D.3d 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

WOODHOUSE v. BOMBARDIER MOTOR CORP., AM

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW J. WOODHOUSE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOMBARDIER MOTOR CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 19, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
773 N.Y.S.2d 324