From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodford v. Visciotti

U.S.
Jan 13, 2003
537 U.S. 1149 (2003)

Summary

reversing appellate court's rejection of state court's finding that petitioner was not prejudiced by his counsel's failure to present mitigation evidence at the penalty phase of his trial

Summary of this case from Darling v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corr.

Opinion

No. 02-137.

January 13, 2003.


Petition for rehearing denied.


Summaries of

Woodford v. Visciotti

U.S.
Jan 13, 2003
537 U.S. 1149 (2003)

reversing appellate court's rejection of state court's finding that petitioner was not prejudiced by his counsel's failure to present mitigation evidence at the penalty phase of his trial

Summary of this case from Darling v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corr.

reversing appellate court's rejection of state court's finding that petitioner was not prejudiced by his counsel's failure to present mitigation evidence at the penalty phase of his trial

Summary of this case from Kimbrough v. Crosby
Case details for

Woodford v. Visciotti

Case Details

Full title:WOODFORD, WARDEN v. VISCIOTTI, ante, p. 19

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 13, 2003

Citations

537 U.S. 1149 (2003)

Citing Cases

Pittman v. Sec'y, Dep't. of Corr.

The Florida Supreme Court also found that Pittman failed to establish any resulting prejudice based upon his…

Kimbrough v. Crosby

The Court is cognizant that it may not substitute its judgment on this issue for judgments made by the state…