From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodbury v. Whiting

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll
Jun 1, 1895
44 A. 385 (N.H. 1895)

Opinion

Decided June, 1895.

CASE, for slander. The plaintiff excepted to evidence offered by the defendant in mitigation of damages. Verdict for the defendant.

George W. M. Pitman and James A. Edgerly, for the plaintiff.

Elmer J. Smart and John B. Nash, for the defendant.


The jury could not have found for the defendant if they had not found that the defendant did not speak the words alleged. Wier v. Allen, 51 N.H. 177, 180. If the defendant did not make the charge alleged as the slander, it is of no consequence whether the evidence excepted to was or was not competent upon the question of damages. The case presents no reason for the consideration of that question. Wier v. Allen, supra.

Exception overruled.

CLARK, J., did not sit: the others concurred.


Summaries of

Woodbury v. Whiting

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll
Jun 1, 1895
44 A. 385 (N.H. 1895)
Case details for

Woodbury v. Whiting

Case Details

Full title:WOODBURY v. WHITING

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll

Date published: Jun 1, 1895

Citations

44 A. 385 (N.H. 1895)
68 N.H. 607

Citing Cases

Twarog v. Company

Therefore, if the court's instruction in reference to damages was incorrect, it was immaterial. Kuba v.…

Small v. Saunders

Kuba v. Devonshire Mills, 78 N.H. 245. See also Kingsley v. Holbrook, 45 N.H. 313; Graves v. Graves, 45 N.H.…