Summary
dismissing with prejudice Wood's state habeas claim
Summary of this case from Wood v. ReynoldsOpinion
Case No. 3:19-cv-304
11-10-2020
MICHAEL A. WOOD, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Noble Correctional Institution, Respondent.
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 32), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition be DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. November 10, 2020.
/s/_________(tp - per Judge Rice authorization after his review)
Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge