From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Womack v. Hauschildt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Mar 11, 2013
No. C12-5431 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. C12-5431 RBL/KLS

03-11-2013

WILLIAM WOMACK, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT FRANK HAUSCHILDT, JOHN/JANE DOE, Defendants.


ORDER CHANGING CASE CAPTION

Before the Court is Plaintiff William Womack's "Motion to Enjoin Defendant," pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 19(a) to join Sergeant Frank Hauschildt as a defendant. ECF No. 17. Plaintiff previously identified this person only as "Frank (last name unknown)." ECF No. 5. An answer (ECF No. 11) and motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 13) have been filed correctly identifying the defendant as Frank Hauschildt (ECF No. 13). Thus, there is no reason to "join" Defendant Hauschildt as an "additional" defendant, but the case caption and further pleadings should reflect the correct name of this defendant.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

(1) The Clerk is directed to change the case caption to reflect the correct name of Defendant Frank Hauschildt. Plaintiff's motion to enjoin (ECF No. 17) is DENIED as moot.

(2) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to counsel for Defendants.

________________________

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Womack v. Hauschildt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Mar 11, 2013
No. C12-5431 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Womack v. Hauschildt

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM WOMACK, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT FRANK HAUSCHILDT, JOHN/JANE DOE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Mar 11, 2013

Citations

No. C12-5431 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 11, 2013)