From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfson v. Menardo

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Apr 27, 1990
573 A.2d 390 (Me. 1990)

Opinion

Submitted on Briefs April 25, 1990.

Decided April 27, 1990.

Appeal from the Superior Court, York County.

Jacob Apuzzo, Kennebunk, for plaintiff.

Sal DeVito, Kennebunk, pro se.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, HORNBY and COLLINS, JJ.


Because the defendants failed to appear at trial in the District Court (Biddeford, MacNichol, J.), we agree with the Superior Court (York County, Brodrick, J.) that they cannot later argue that they were not the proper parties to the lawsuit. Nor can the defendants raise for the first time on appeal their arguments that the amount billed them was unfair, that they should have been allotted a setoff for late delivery or that they believed that the trial would be postponed. The defendants should have presented all those arguments to the District Court. See Blanchette v. York Mut. Ins. Co., 455 A.2d 426, 428 (Me. 1983). Since this appeal is clearly frivolous, we award treble costs to the appellee under M.R.Civ.P. 76(f). See Gurschick v. Clark, 511 A.2d 36 (Me. 1986).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed. Treble costs shall be paid by appellants Anthony Menardo and Sal DeVito to appellee Donna O. Wolfson.


Summaries of

Wolfson v. Menardo

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Apr 27, 1990
573 A.2d 390 (Me. 1990)
Case details for

Wolfson v. Menardo

Case Details

Full title:Donna O. WOLFSON v. Anthony MENARDO and Sal DeVito

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Apr 27, 1990

Citations

573 A.2d 390 (Me. 1990)