From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfson v. Darnell, Rosen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 6, 1962
12 N.Y.2d 819 (N.Y. 1962)

Opinion

Argued October 25, 1962

Decided December 6, 1962

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JAMES J. CRISONA, J.

Harry E. Campbell and Richard Formidoni for appellant.

Harold M. Harkavy for Pauline Rosen, respondent.

Francis J. Hughes and Maurice Lavner for remaining respondents.


Appeal from that part of the judgment which reversed the judgment against defendant-respondent Rosen and dismissed the complaint as to her dismissed, with costs to defendant-respondent Rosen, upon the ground that defendant-appellant is not an aggrieved party (see, e.g., Nekris v. Yellen, 302 N.Y. 626; Ward v. Iroquois Gas Corp., 258 N.Y. 124, 129), and, in all other respects, judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs-respondents. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.


Summaries of

Wolfson v. Darnell, Rosen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 6, 1962
12 N.Y.2d 819 (N.Y. 1962)
Case details for

Wolfson v. Darnell, Rosen

Case Details

Full title:MARCIA WOLFSON et al., Respondents, v. THOMAS E. DARNELL, Appellant, and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 6, 1962

Citations

12 N.Y.2d 819 (N.Y. 1962)
236 N.Y.S.2d 67
187 N.E.2d 133

Citing Cases

Wright v. Morozinis

We find that the Supreme Court erred in denying their motion. It is well established that a driver in…

Tenenbaum v. Martin

Under the facts of this case, Sol Kohl was not negligent as a matter of law and the court should have granted…