From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfson v. Allianz Life Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
May 11, 2015
Civil No. 14-4469 (JNE/BRT) (D. Minn. May. 11, 2015)

Opinion

Civil No. 14-4469 (JNE/BRT)

05-11-2015

Neil Brandon Wolfson, Plaintiff, v. Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America, Defendant.


ORDER

In a Report and Recommendation dated March 26, 2015, the Honorable Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Neil Brandon Wolfson's Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award be denied, that Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America's Application to Confirm Arbitration Award be granted, and that judgment be entered in Allianz's favor. Wolfson objected, and Allianz responded. Based on a de novo review of the record, the Court overrules the objection and accepts the recommended disposition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2012).

In his objection, Wolfson first argued that the magistrate judge erred by denying him the opportunity to submit briefing on the issue of whether he should be allowed to engage in limited discovery to support his contention that the arbitration award was procured by fraud. The magistrate judge denied his oral motion to file supplemental briefing in February 2015. Wolfson did not object within the time allowed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); D. Minn. LR 72.2(a)(1). The Court rejects his first argument.

Next, Wolfson asserted that the magistrate judge erred by concluding that he had failed to establish the arbitration award was procured by fraud. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Court concludes that Wolfson failed to demonstrate the arbitration award was procured by fraud.

Finally, Wolfson argued that the magistrate judge erred by failing to consider his claim that the arbitration award manifestly disregarded the law. He acknowledged that the Eighth Circuit does not recognize manifest disregard for the law as a ground to vacate an arbitration award. He cited cases from other circuits to support his argument. The Court rejects it. See Air Line Pilots Ass'n Int'l v. Trans States Airlines, LLC, 638 F.3d 572, 578 (8th Cir. 2011) (stating Hall Street Assocs., L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), "eliminated judicially created vacatur standards under the [Federal Arbitration Act], including manifest disregard for the law"); Med. Shoppe Int'l, Inc. v. Turner Invs., Inc., 614 F.3d 485, 489 (8th Cir. 2010).

In short, the Court overrules Wolfson's objection and accepts the recommended disposition [Docket No. 42]. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Wolfson's Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award [Docket No. 2] is DENIED.



2. Allianz's Application to Confirm Arbitration Award [Docket No. 19] is GRANTED.



3. Judgment is entered in favor of Allianz in the amount of $542,807.25, plus pre-award interest at a rate of 6% per year from August 23, 2013, through July 25, 2014, as ordered by the final arbitration award, and post-award, pre-judgment interest at a rate of 10% per year from July 26, 2014, until judgment is entered in this case.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: May 11, 2015

s/Joan N. Ericksen

JOAN N. ERICKSEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wolfson v. Allianz Life Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
May 11, 2015
Civil No. 14-4469 (JNE/BRT) (D. Minn. May. 11, 2015)
Case details for

Wolfson v. Allianz Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Neil Brandon Wolfson, Plaintiff, v. Allianz Life Insurance Company of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: May 11, 2015

Citations

Civil No. 14-4469 (JNE/BRT) (D. Minn. May. 11, 2015)

Citing Cases

Yufan Zhang v. UnitedHealth Grp.

"But given 'the strong federal policy favoring arbitration,' fraud under the FAA demands a 'greater level of…

Johnson v. Pizza Hut

Moreover, Rule 60(b) "is not a discovery tool, and the Supreme Court has made clear that the [Federal…