From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolferen v. New York Life Insurance Co.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 18, 2007
NO. CIV. S-07-935 LKK/DAD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2007)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-07-935 LKK/DAD.

June 18, 2007


ORDER


Pending before the court on the June 18, 2007 law and motion calendar are a motion to remand the case to state court filed by plaintiffs and a motion to dismiss plaintiff's third claim for relief filed by defendant.

The court is in receipt the parties' joint stipulation to remand the case to state court and plaintiffs' withdrawal and waiver of the request for sanctions made in their remand motion.

Good cause appearing, the court orders as follows:

(1) The above-captioned case REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California and for the County of Sacramento.

(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Remand is GRANTED, but denied with respect to sanctions.

(3) Defendant's Motion is DENIED as moot.

(4) the hearing set for June 18, 2007 is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wolferen v. New York Life Insurance Co.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 18, 2007
NO. CIV. S-07-935 LKK/DAD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2007)
Case details for

Wolferen v. New York Life Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY VAN WOLFEREN and SEAN REED, Plaintiffs, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 18, 2007

Citations

NO. CIV. S-07-935 LKK/DAD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2007)

Citing Cases

Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hurst

A great number of decisions are cited in support of this contention. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Blue, 222…

Lowe v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co.

The facts are not fully stated in Ginell v. Prudential Ins. Co., 237 N.Y. 554, 143 N.E. 740, where the Court…