From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfe v. Hartford Life Ins. Co.

U.S.
Mar 27, 1893
148 U.S. 389 (1893)

Summary

explaining that where the complaint avers that the plaintiff "'ever since has been, and still is, a resident of the city, county, and state of New York,' but his citizenship is nowhere disclosed by the record," "[i]t is essential, in cases where the jurisdiction depends upon the citizenship of the parties, that such citizenship, or the facts which in legal intendment constitute it, should be distinctly and positively averred in the pleadings, or should appear with equal distinctness in other parts of the record. It is not sufficient that jurisdiction may be inferred argumentatively from the averments"

Summary of this case from Shaffer v. Gallub

Opinion

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

No. 162.

Submitted March 23, 1893. Decided March 27, 1893.

A complaint which avers that the plaintiff was, at the several times named therein, "and ever since has been and still is a resident of the city, county and State of New York," is not sufficient to give the Circuit Court of that circuit jurisdiction on the ground of citizenship of the parties, when the record nowhere discloses the plaintiff's citizenship.

Mr. Robert S. Green and Mr. Henry Thompson for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. Herman Kobbe for defendant in error.


THE case is stated in the opinion.


The complaint in this case avers that the plaintiff was at the several times mentioned therein, "and ever since has been and still is, a resident of the city, county and State of New York," but his citizenship is nowhere disclosed by the record.

It is essential in cases where the jurisdiction depends upon the citizenship of the parties that such citizenship, or the facts which in legal intendment constitute it, should be distinctly and positively averred in the pleadings, or should appear with equal distinctness in other parts of the record. It is not sufficient that jurisdiction may be inferred argumentatively from the averments. Brown v. Keene, 8 Pet. 112, 115; Continental Ins. Co. v. Rhoads, 119 U.S. 237; Menard v. Goggan, 121 U.S. 253.

Judgment reversed at the cost of plaintiff in error and the cause remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Wolfe v. Hartford Life Ins. Co.

U.S.
Mar 27, 1893
148 U.S. 389 (1893)

explaining that where the complaint avers that the plaintiff "'ever since has been, and still is, a resident of the city, county, and state of New York,' but his citizenship is nowhere disclosed by the record," "[i]t is essential, in cases where the jurisdiction depends upon the citizenship of the parties, that such citizenship, or the facts which in legal intendment constitute it, should be distinctly and positively averred in the pleadings, or should appear with equal distinctness in other parts of the record. It is not sufficient that jurisdiction may be inferred argumentatively from the averments"

Summary of this case from Shaffer v. Gallub
Case details for

Wolfe v. Hartford Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:WOLFE v . HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 27, 1893

Citations

148 U.S. 389 (1893)
13 S. Ct. 602

Citing Cases

Porghavami v. Aerolinea Principal Chile S.A.

"It is firmly established that diversity of citizenship '"should be distinctly and positively averred in the…

Wade v. Wood

Mas v. Perry, 489 F.2d 1396, 1399 (5th Cir. 1974). See also Wolfe v. Hartford Life Annuity Ins. Co., 148…