From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolf v. Wolf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 24, 1989
146 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

January 24, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline W. Silbermann, J.).


It was error for the court below to have granted plaintiff's motion for interim counsel fees in the sum of $20,000. Domestic Relations Law § 237 (a) provides for an award of counsel fees or litigation expenses on an interim basis, in advance of final judgment, upon a showing that the award is required "to enable the petitioning party to properly proceed."

In the within matter, plaintiff made an application for counsel fees a mere six weeks after retaining counsel, and after paying her counsel $10,000. In support of her application, plaintiff submitted an affidavit from her attorney. Although the affidavit states that counsel's firm has incurred thousands of dollars in time charges and disbursements, it fails to detail the services rendered, how much of the retainer fee has already been used, or the hourly rate of counsel and her associates.

Upon this record, we find that plaintiff has failed to adequately substantiate her claim that she is in need of such a large award at this stage of the litigation. Of course, plaintiff can make a further application when and if the need arises (see, Levy v Levy, 140 A.D.2d 210; Goldberg v Goldberg, 76 A.D.2d 776), and the court may properly grant her application when it has before it the requisite information to substantiate an award.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Milonas, Kassal and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Wolf v. Wolf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 24, 1989
146 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Wolf v. Wolf

Case Details

Full title:TONI WOLF, Respondent, v. DAVID WOLF, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 24, 1989

Citations

146 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Wolf v. Wolf

The plaintiff-respondent wife had previously been awarded $20,000 in pendente lite counsel fees. That award…

Mimran v. Mimran

Moreover, under all the circumstances and, in particular, the extraordinarily high standard of living to…