From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolf v. Heating Maintenance Corp. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 9, 1964
20 A.D.2d 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

April 9, 1964


Order, entered January 6, 1964, denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. While the affidavits of defendant may be lacking in the degree of disclosure of evidentiary facts which is expected in opposition to a motion for summary judgment, plaintiff's affidavits are equally deficient as to the circumstances of the alleged signing of the agreement of employment, and as to the existence of the alleged agreement of November, 1961, upon which defendant relies. Neither of the parties has presented adequately the transactions and relationships upon which the determination of this case will eventually rest. The deficiencies in the affidavits on both sides upon crucial matters require that the movant be denied the summary relief sought. ( Colonie Mohawk Corp. v. Gilbert Barker Mfg. Co., 15 A.D.2d 841, 842; O'Connor-Sullivan v. Otto, 283 App. Div. 269, 272.)

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.


Summaries of

Wolf v. Heating Maintenance Corp. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 9, 1964
20 A.D.2d 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Wolf v. Heating Maintenance Corp. of New York

Case Details

Full title:LUCILLE WOLF, Appellant, v. HEATING MAINTENANCE CORPORATION OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1964

Citations

20 A.D.2d 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

Wein v. Carey

A deficiency in the affidavits and documentation submitted by both sides on crucial matters requires that the…

Smith v. Johnson Products Co.

Defendant Wolkow argues that the party opposing a motion for summary judgment is obliged to come forward with…