From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolf v. Capstone Photography, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 29, 2014
Case No. 13-CV-09573-CAS-PJW (C.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2014)

Summary

explaining that a “patent claim can be found directed towards patent ineligible subject matter if the only plausible reading of the patent must be that there is clear and convincing evidence of ineligibility”

Summary of this case from BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT & T Mobility LLC

Opinion

Case No. 13-CV-09573-CAS-PJW

10-29-2014

PETER H. WOLF Plaintiff, v. CAPSTONE PHOTOGRAPHY, INC. a Connecticut corporation, MICHAEL SKELPS, an individual, and DOES 1-10, inclusive Defendants.


JUDGMENT

JUDGE: Hon. Christina A. Snyder

On October 28, 2014, the Court issued an order granting defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. Dkt. No. 49. In accordance with that order, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), the Court enters judgment in favor of defendants on plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,985,875; 7,047,214; and 7,870,035.

Dated: October 29, 2014

/s/_________

HONORABLE CHRISTINA A. SNYDER


Summaries of

Wolf v. Capstone Photography, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 29, 2014
Case No. 13-CV-09573-CAS-PJW (C.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2014)

explaining that a “patent claim can be found directed towards patent ineligible subject matter if the only plausible reading of the patent must be that there is clear and convincing evidence of ineligibility”

Summary of this case from BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT & T Mobility LLC
Case details for

Wolf v. Capstone Photography, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PETER H. WOLF Plaintiff, v. CAPSTONE PHOTOGRAPHY, INC. a Connecticut…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 29, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13-CV-09573-CAS-PJW (C.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2014)

Citing Cases

Tuxis Techs., LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.

(D.I. 28, 29 & 30). For the reasons that follow, Amazon's Motion to Dismiss is granted with respect to all of…

Boar's Head Corporation

Id. Although plaintiff presents these issues as "necessary factual predicates," they more closely resemble…