Opinion
Argued March 7, 1894
Decided April 10, 1894
Thomas J. Keigharn for appellant.
John Henry Hull for respondents.
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
W.J. Johnston Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 10, 1894
37 N.E. 564 (N.Y. 1894)
Summaries of
W.J. Johnston Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 10, 1894
37 N.E. 564 (N.Y. 1894)
Case details for
W.J. Johnston Company
Case Details
Full title:THE W.J. JOHNSTON COMPANY (Limited), Appellant, v . WALTER T. HUNT et al.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 10, 1894
Citations
37 N.E. 564 (N.Y. 1894)
37 N.E. 564
Citing Cases
McCall Co. v. Wright
The plaintiff presents a clear case of an inexcusable abandonment of the contract by the defendant, which…
Love, et al., v. Miami Laundry Co.In a case of this sort the contracting employer should be relegated to his suit at law for breach of the…