From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wittenberg Distrib. v. Kuhns Bros. Laidlaw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 2, 1989
151 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

June 2, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Lowery, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: A retainer fee will not be deemed nonrefundable unless the language of an agreement to that effect is clear and it is established that the party obligated to pay the retainer understood that to be the nature of the agreement (see, Jacobson v. Sassower, 66 N.Y.2d 991, 993, affg 107 A.D.2d 603). In this case, the agreement omitted any reference to whether the retainer was refundable, and Supreme Court correctly determined that plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment for the amount of the retainer fee it paid.


Summaries of

Wittenberg Distrib. v. Kuhns Bros. Laidlaw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 2, 1989
151 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Wittenberg Distrib. v. Kuhns Bros. Laidlaw

Case Details

Full title:WITTENBERG DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Respondent, v. KUHNS BROTHERS LAIDLAW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1989

Citations

151 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
542 N.Y.S.2d 67