From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wisznic v. Nostrand Shoppers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 1995
215 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 15, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the defendant-respondent.

The plaintiffs commenced this action to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained when the plaintiff Bernard Wisznic fell into an opening in a clothing store owned by Nostrand Shoppers, Inc. (hereinafter Nostrand Shoppers). The opening, which led to a storage area in the basement, was normally covered by a trap door. There is no evidence that Nostrand Shoppers negligently or defectively constructed, maintained or repaired the premises or that there was any violation of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. There is no evidence that the trap door constituted a defective condition and there is no claim that an unsafe condition existed when the door was in place (see, Brown v Weinreb, 183 A.D.2d 562; Kramer v Ash Clothing, 213 A.D.2d 600). Here, the door became unsafe only after it was left in an open position. Additionally, liability cannot be imposed on Nostrand Shoppers for its failure to provide other safeguards to prevent injury (Brown v Weinreb, supra). Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wisznic v. Nostrand Shoppers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 1995
215 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Wisznic v. Nostrand Shoppers, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD WISZNIC et al., Respondents, v. NOSTRAND SHOPPERS, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 15, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 837

Citing Cases

Reid v. 320 E. 81st Street Corp.

For a court to conclude, as a matter of law, that a jury verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence, it…

Matter of Eveready Ins. Co. v. Royal Ins. Co.

Decided September 14, 1995 Appeal from (2d Dept: 215 A.D.2d 553) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…