From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wishek v. Hildenbrand

Supreme Court of North Dakota
May 2, 1925
204 N.W. 364 (N.D. 1925)

Opinion

Opinion filed May 2, 1925. Rehearing denied May 25, 1925.

Appeal from the District Court of McIntosh County, Wolfe, J.

Affirmed.

Franz Shubeck, for appellants.

Schneller, Heder, Schneller and Purcell Slattery, amicus curiæ.

Wishek Wishek, A.A. Ludwigs, Lauder Lauder, and H.P. Remington, for respondent.


This is an action brought by the plaintiff, under chapter 172 of the Session Laws of 1923, to disconnect 160 acres of land belonging to the plaintiff from the city of Ashley in the county of McIntosh and State of North Dakota. The petition, proof of hearing of petition before the city council, decision of the city council, and the decision of the judge of the district court on certiorari, are in all things the same as in the case of Enderson v. Hildebrand, ante, 533, decided at this term, and which decision governs and controls the decision in this case. The decision of the lower court on certiorari is in all things affirmed.

CHRISTIANSON, Ch. J., and BIRDZELL, JOHNSON, and NUESSLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wishek v. Hildenbrand

Supreme Court of North Dakota
May 2, 1925
204 N.W. 364 (N.D. 1925)
Case details for

Wishek v. Hildenbrand

Case Details

Full title:J.H. WISHEK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM HILDENBRAND as Mayor, and Christ…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: May 2, 1925

Citations

204 N.W. 364 (N.D. 1925)
204 N.W. 364

Citing Cases

Dodson v. DHS

[¶ 10.] Appellees contend that it was proper to instruct the jury on contributory negligence relying upon a…

St. Mary's Hospital v. Scanlon

This duty is limited by the rule that no one is required to guard against or take measures to avert that…