From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wise v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Nov 18, 1988
539 So. 2d 1061 (Ala. Civ. App. 1988)

Opinion

Civ. 6501.

August 3, 1988. Rehearing Denied August 31, 1988. Certiorari Denied November 18, 1988 Alabama Supreme Court 87-1523.

Appeal from Covington Circuit Court, Covington County; William H. Baldwin, Judge.

Jack W. Smith, Dothan, for appellant.

N.T. Braswell III of Rushton, Stakely, Johnston and Garrett, Montgomery, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a judgment overruling the plaintiff's motion filed under Rule 60(b)(1) of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure.

The plaintiff's appeal is substantially in the same procedural posture as was the case of Vaughan v. Vaughan, 539 So.2d 1058 (Ala.Civ.App. 1988). Since this appeal was timely taken, the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's appeal is overruled. Vaughan, supra.

The denial of a Rule 60(b)(1) motion falls within the judicial discretion of the trial court, and an appellate court is only authorized to disturb the trial court's ruling thereon for an abuse of that discretion. Menefee v. Veal, 484 So.2d 437 (Ala. 1986). We have carefully reviewed the record herein and the briefs of learned counsel. Finding no abuse of judicial discretion by the trial court, we affirm the order denying the plaintiff's Rule 60(b)(1) motion.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Circuit Judge EDWARD N. SCRUGGS while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of § 12-18-10(e), Code 1975, and this opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.


Summaries of

Wise v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Nov 18, 1988
539 So. 2d 1061 (Ala. Civ. App. 1988)
Case details for

Wise v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

Case Details

Full title:John Wayne WISE v. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, INC

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Nov 18, 1988

Citations

539 So. 2d 1061 (Ala. Civ. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Mitten v. Wisconsin Brands, Inc.

"It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that defendant's motion for relief from judgment is due to…

E. H. Smith and Son v. Springdale Mall

Because the motion was timely made, we must consider whether the trial court erred in denying relief from the…