From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wireless Ink Corp. v. Google, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 16, 2014
570 F. App'x 941 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Opinion

2013-1683 2013-1684

07-16-2014

WIRELESS INK CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC, AND FACEBOOK, INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND YOUTUBE, INC., AND MYSPACE, INC., Defendants. WIRELESS INK CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FACEBOOK, INC. AND GOOGLE, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

JEREMY S. PITCOCK, The Pitcock Law Group, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief was PAPOOL S. CHAUDHARI, Chaudhari Law, PLLC, of Wylie, Texas. JOHN CHRISTOPHER ROZENDAAL, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for Facebook, Inc., were MICHAEL E. JOFFRE and MELANIE L. BOSTWICK. Of counsel on the brief for Facebook, Inc., were HEIDI L. KEEFE, MARK R. WEINSTEIN, and ELIZABETH L. STAMESHKIN, Cooley LLP, of Palo Alto, California. On the brief for Google, Inc. and YouTube, LLC, were KEVIN X. MCGANN, AARON CHASE, and ADAM GAHTAN, White & Case LLP, of New York, New York.


Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Nos. 11-cv-01751 and 10-cv-01841, Judge P. Kevin Castel.

JUDGMENT

JEREMY S. PITCOCK, The Pitcock Law Group, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief was PAPOOL S. CHAUDHARI, Chaudhari Law, PLLC, of Wylie, Texas.

JOHN CHRISTOPHER ROZENDAAL, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for Facebook, Inc., were MICHAEL E. JOFFRE and MELANIE L. BOSTWICK. Of counsel on the brief for Facebook, Inc., were HEIDI L. KEEFE, MARK R. WEINSTEIN, and ELIZABETH L. STAMESHKIN, Cooley LLP, of Palo Alto, California. On the brief for Google, Inc. and YouTube, LLC, were KEVIN X. MCGANN, AARON CHASE, and ADAM GAHTAN, White & Case LLP, of New York, New York. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

__________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Wireless Ink Corp. v. Google, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 16, 2014
570 F. App'x 941 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Wireless Ink Corp. v. Google, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WIRELESS INK CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., YOUTUBE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 16, 2014

Citations

570 F. App'x 941 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Mich & Mich TGR, Inc. v. Brazabra

"Where ... the parties do not dispute any relevant facts regarding the accused product [and] disagree over…