From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winter v. Rickman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 1966
26 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

October 31, 1966


In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered February 8, 1966, which (1) granted plaintiff's motion to set aside a jury verdict in defendants' favor and (2) ordered a new trial. Order reversed, with costs; plaintiff's motion denied; verdict for defendants reinstated; and judgment directed to be entered accordingly, in favor of defendants. A jury verdict in favor of a defendant should not be set aside unless it is clear from the record that the jury could not have reached its conclusion on any fair interpretation of the evidence ( Kalin v. Robert Catino, Inc., 20 A.D.2d 549; Pertofsky v. Drucks, 16 A.D.2d 690). In our opinion there was ample evidence upon which the jury could find in favor of defendants. Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Winter v. Rickman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 1966
26 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Winter v. Rickman

Case Details

Full title:EVELYN C. WINTER, as Administratrix of the Estate of JOHN F. WINTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1966

Citations

26 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Roth v. City of New York

Order reversed, without costs; motions to set aside verdicts denied; and verdicts reinstated. A jury verdict…

Farber v. Smolack

There was ample evidence to support a finding by the jury that there was no actionable negligence…