From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winter Management Corp. v. Perlbinder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1992
179 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

January 21, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. Greenfield, J.).


The IAS court correctly denied the motion to set aside the appraisal as no longer connected with the remedy invoked in the action (Matter of Cammaratta, 60 Misc.2d 521, 523). In any event, absent a showing of fraud, bias or bad faith, there is no basis to set aside the appraisal (Olympia York 2 Broadway Co. v. Produce Exch. Realty Trust, 93 A.D.2d 465). No such showing is made here. That portion of the order as denied reargument is non-appealable (Cross v. Cross, 112 A.D.2d 62). Nor were any new facts presented such that the motion could be deemed one for renewal. We have previously passed on an aspect of this matter ( 149 A.D.2d 310).

Concur — Wallach, J.P., Kupferman, Ross, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Winter Management Corp. v. Perlbinder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1992
179 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Winter Management Corp. v. Perlbinder

Case Details

Full title:WINTER MANAGEMENT CORP. et al., Respondents, v. BARTON M. PERLBINDER et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1992

Citations

179 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Perlbinder v. Jakubovitz

Summary judgment should have been granted to defendant, the independent third real estate appraiser appointed…

In Matter of Romano

Even if it turns out that the appraisal is flawed, an executor is not "imprudent in relying on the opinion of…