From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winney v. Leuci

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 19, 1947
189 Misc. 441 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)

Opinion

June 19, 1947.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, RICHARDSON, J.

Joseph M. Lonergan for appellant.

Max Weisser for Henry J. Weisser, respondent.


MEMORANDUM


The judgment insofar as appealed from should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $30 costs to appellant against impleaded plaintiff Weisser and cross-claim dismissed.

The impleaded plaintiff acquired the automobile in question from a thief. It follows that he may not assert against the true owner a claim for the cost of repairs or improvements made to the automobile without the owner's knowledge or consent. (Cf. Bateman v. Clark, 263 A.D. 789; New York Yellow Cab Co. Sales Agency, Inc., v. Laurel Garage, Inc., 219 A.D. 329; Auto Dealers Discount Corp. v. Budd, 242 A.D. 37. )

MacCRATE, STEINBRINK and RUBENSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Winney v. Leuci

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 19, 1947
189 Misc. 441 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)
Case details for

Winney v. Leuci

Case Details

Full title:HERBERT WINNEY, Appellant, and HENRY J. WEISSER, Respondent, v. FRANK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jun 19, 1947

Citations

189 Misc. 441 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)
74 N.Y.S.2d 585

Citing Cases

United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Marshall

"It is our opinion that plaintiff, deriving its title from a thief, may not assert against the true owner or…

Hartford Ins. Co. v. Albertson

Defendants also are not aided by section 184 Lien of the Lien Law which gives the garageman a lien only when…