From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wingenbach v. Mushroom Transp. Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 13, 1976
51 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

February 13, 1976

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Moule, J.P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Goldman, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: This is an appeal by Mushroom Transportation Company, Inc., from an order of Special Term, Erie County, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint, denied plaintiff-respondent's motion for summary judgment and granted plaintiff-respondent's motion to amend its complaint. Special Term properly concluded that, construing the complaint and moving papers liberally and accepting Wingenbach's factual allegations as true, plaintiff has ample legal basis for viable causes of action against both the union and his employer, Mushroom Transportation Company, Inc. Further, since plaintiff, Wingenbach, attempted to use the grievance procedure (Republic Steel v Maddox, 379 U.S. 650), claimed that the union breached its duty of fair representation in not processing his claims and that defendant-appellant repudiated the contract grievance procedure by not honoring the decision of the State joint and local committees (Vaca v Sipes, 386 U.S. 171), and asserted that further resort to the grievance procedure would be futile (Glover v St. Louis — San Francisco Ry. Co., 393 U.S. 324), we conclude that at this stage of the litigation the employer's defense of nonexhaustion of administrative remedies does not bar Wingenbach's suit for wrongful discharge (Schum v Buffalo Ry. Co., 496 F.2d 328).


Summaries of

Wingenbach v. Mushroom Transp. Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 13, 1976
51 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Wingenbach v. Mushroom Transp. Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN E. WINGENBACH, Respondent, v. MUSHROOM TRANSPORTATION Co., INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 13, 1976

Citations

51 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Nikiel v. City of Buffalo

Plaintiffs have no internal union remedies available to them and they initiated the instant action in July,…

Jackson v. Regional Transit Service

Plaintiff was employed in the public sector by respondent RTS. In the private sector where the rights of an…