From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Ford

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth
Jun 14, 1913
159 S.W. 73 (Tex. Civ. App. 1913)

Opinion

May 17, 1913. Rehearing Denied June 14, 1913.

Appeal from Wichita County Court; C. B. Felder, Judge.

Action by Henry Ford against J. D. Wilson. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.

W. T. Carlton, of Wichita Falls, for appellant. Mathis Kay, of Wichita Falls, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of Henry Ford against defendant, J. D. Wilson, instituted in the county court of Wichita county to recover upon certain promissory notes and for a foreclosure of chattel mortgage liens upon several horses and a crop of 150 acres of cotton.

Neither the original nor the supplemental petition, which constituted the pleadings upon which plaintiff relied upon the trial, contains any allegation of the value of the property upon which a foreclosure of lien was sought. According to the well-settled rule, if the value of this property exceeded the sum of $1,000, the county court had no jurisdiction of plaintiff's suit.

In the absence of an affirmative showing of jurisdiction of the county court to hear and determine the controversy, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded; and it is so ordered. Ware v. Clark, 125 S.W. 618; Stricklin v. Arrington Carter, 141 S.W. 189.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Ford

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth
Jun 14, 1913
159 S.W. 73 (Tex. Civ. App. 1913)
Case details for

Wilson v. Ford

Case Details

Full title:WILSON v. FORD

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth

Date published: Jun 14, 1913

Citations

159 S.W. 73 (Tex. Civ. App. 1913)

Citing Cases

Olloqui v. Duran

The county court being a court of limited jurisdiction it was necessary that plaintiff's petition…

Tant v. Baldwin Piano Co.

This assignment is sustained. Cotulla v. Goggan, 77 Tex. 32, 13 S.W. 742; Railway Co. v. Rucker, 38 Tex. Civ.…