Summary
dismissing personal injury claim against off-duty police officer where action was brought after one-year-and-ninety-day limitation period and officer was attempting to stop crime in progress when injury occurred
Summary of this case from Singleton v. City of NewburghOpinion
May 14, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.).
In the underlying action, plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injuries he sustained on June 16, 1984 as a passenger in a taxicab driven by defendant George Addison, an off-duty New York City Police Officer, when the vehicle crashed into a construction site after defendant Addison had exited the vehicle in an effort to apprehend two individuals attempting to break into a parked car.
Upon examination of the record, we find that the IAS court properly dismissed the complaint as against the defendant City and its employee, defendant Addison, as time-barred pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-i where the action against the defendants was concededly not commenced within one year and ninety days after the event upon which the claim was based (Alifieris v American Airlines, 63 N.Y.2d 370, 374), and where the complaint itself alleged and the record revealed that defendant Addison was, on the date in question, acting within the scope of his employment in his capacity as a member of the New York City Police Department (Bacalokonstantis v Nichols, 141 A.D.2d 482, 483).
We have reviewed the plaintiff's remaining claims and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Carro, J.P., Milonas, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.