From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Brown

Supreme Court of Delaware
Apr 14, 2011
19 A.3d 302 (Del. 2011)

Summary

finding that incorporating prior paragraphs of one claim by reference into another did not cure the latter for lack of particularity

Summary of this case from Murray v. Mason

Opinion

No. 468, 2010.

Submitted: April 13, 2011.

Decided: April 14, 2011.

Court Below — Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County, C.A. No. 08C-080135.

Before HOLLAND, BERGER and JACOBS, Justices.


ORDER


This 14th day of April 2011, the Court having considered this matter after oral argument and on the briefs filed by the parties has determined that the summary judgment of the Superior Court that was entered in favor of the defendants-appellees should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its well-reasoned decision dated July 6, 2010.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Brown

Supreme Court of Delaware
Apr 14, 2011
19 A.3d 302 (Del. 2011)

finding that incorporating prior paragraphs of one claim by reference into another did not cure the latter for lack of particularity

Summary of this case from Murray v. Mason
Case details for

Wilson v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:TASHELL WILSON and GERMAYNE EMORY, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. TRACY…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Apr 14, 2011

Citations

19 A.3d 302 (Del. 2011)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Hunter

Affdsub nom. Wilson v. Brown, 2011 WL 143666 (Del. 2011) Defs.' Mot. to Dismiss Ct. II, at 4, D.I.…

Murray v. Mason

Super. July 6, 2010), aff'd sub nom. Wilson v. Brown , 19 A.3d 302 (Del. 2011) (finding that incorporating…