From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willis v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 12, 2021
No. 20-15127 (9th Cir. May. 12, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-15127

05-12-2021

KENTRELL WILLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00761-LJO-BAM MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Lawrence J. O'Neill, District Judge, Presiding Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Federal prisoner Kentrell Willis appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his action under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA") as barred by the statute of limitations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Gregg v. Haw. Dep't of Pub. Safety, 870 F.3d 883, 886 (9th Cir. 2017) (dismissal as time-barred); Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)); Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A). We vacate and remand.

The district court determined that Willis's claims were time-barred and that Willis was not entitled to equitable tolling. However, Willis alleged that prison officials withheld his legal materials necessary to file a well-pleaded complaint. It is not evident at this early stage in the proceedings that equitable tolling would not apply to extend the limitations proceeding. See 28 U.S.C § 2401(b); Wong v. Beebe, 732 F.3d 1030, 1052 (9th Cir. 2013) (explaining elements necessary for equitable tolling); Cervantes v. City of San Diego, 5 F.3d 1273, 1276-77 (9th Cir. 1993) (noting dismissal on the basis of the statute of limitations is disfavored where the complaint, liberally construed, adequately alleges facts showing the potential applicability of tolling). Because the action was dismissed at screening, and the grounds for equitable tolling are highly fact-dependent, we vacate and remand for the district court to order service of the complaint on defendant.

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Willis v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 12, 2021
No. 20-15127 (9th Cir. May. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Willis v. United States

Case Details

Full title:KENTRELL WILLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 12, 2021

Citations

No. 20-15127 (9th Cir. May. 12, 2021)