Opinion
Case No.: 2:14-cv-01122-APG-PAL
08-04-2015
CHRISTOPHER J. WILLING, Plaintiff, v. ARMS, et al., Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
(Dkt. #33)
Pro se plaintiff Christopher Willing filed a "Section 1983" suit against defendants Nye County Detention Center (NCDC), Deputy Arms, Sergeant Martinez, Lieutenant Medina, and Health Care Partners for violating his Fourteenth Amendment rights while in pretrial detention. Willing alleges he broke his collarbone while in custody and that the defendants interfered with, delayed, and denied the necessary treatment of his injury. Willing also alleges defendants' actions and inactions caused him further pain and suffering. Defendant NCDC moves to dismiss Willing's claims against it because it is not an entity capable of being sued. Because NCDC is a department of Nye County and cannot be sued, I grant its motion.
(Dkt. #6.)
(Id. at 3.)
(Id. at 3-5.)
(Dkt. #33.)
In assessing a motion to dismiss, I must accept as true all well-pleaded factual allegations in the complaint; however, legal conclusions are not entitled to the assumption of truth. A complaint need not contain detailed factual allegations; however, those allegations must be "more than labels and conclusions" and must "rise above the speculative level." Thus, to survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter to "state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face." Allegations in a pro se complaint are "held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers."
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009).
Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007).
Id. at 570.
Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S. 5, 9 (1980) (quotation omitted).
The issue here is whether NCDC is a properly-named defendant. In Nevada, each county is a political subdivision of the state and an independent legal entity, which means each county can sue or be sued. But the same is not true of a county detention center. Rather, a county detention center is a department of the county and not an independent legal entity. Therefore, it cannot be sued under its own name. Accordingly, I grant NCDC's motion because NCDC is not a suable entity, and thus Willing cannot state a cognizable legal claim against it.
Clark Cnty. v. Lewis, 498 P.2d 363, 365 (Nev. 1972); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 41.031(2).
Wayment v. Holmes, 912 P.2d 816, 819-20 (Nev. 1996); Wright v. City of Las Vegas, Nev, 395 F. Supp. 2d 789, 794 (S.D. Iowa 2005) ("In Nevada, political subdivisions may be sued; departments of political subdivisions may not." (citing Nev. Rev. Stat. § 41.031(1)-(2) (2004))). --------
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Nye County Detention Center's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 33) is GRANTED. All of plaintiff's claims against Nye County Detention Center are dismissed with prejudice.
DATED this 4th day of August, 2015.
/s/_________
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE